![]() (JRMC doesn't use the AccurateRip database or C2 pointers info.)Īnother 3-4% required extra reads on one or more tracks but the tracks could be ripped with confidence. About 95% of my CDs required no extra re-reads. I had treated those CDs with care - no big scratches or other defects. I didn't find any differences in results between these programs. I experimented with EAC, dBpoweramp and J. I kept track of my results as I ripped about 2000 CDs. Thanks for reporting your experimental results and on your experience with ripping. One possible effect could therefore be that poorer CD transports producing a higher incidence of read errors and relying more heavily on error concealment might exhibit poorer harmonic texture and imaging, both of which are reliant on high frequency information. Error correction should of course in theory be inaudible (and will be as long as the algorithm is bug-free and the system is working fast enough), however error concealment (interpolation) will tend to be less accurate the higher the frequency of the signal, to the point where at 22.05kHz it becomes completely useless. This would seem to indicate that read errors are pretty common and that error correction or error concealment are working hard to cover them up. Only in a very small number of cases (max 2-3%) am I completely unable to get a secure rip. ![]() are in the distinct minority, 75%?) although in the vast majority of those cases the result subsequently agrees with AccurateRip.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |